tag harvester

a tag harvester is (will be) a thing that scans my text (post) and lists terms i used, perhaps by frequency. i can (will be able to) click however many of the toply relevant terms i want to be harvested as tags (or choose a continual preference of ‘top three’).

a really good tag harvester would relate my tags to those relevant terms used by others, and list these webwide terms, as well. i could add some of these as tags, or alter some of my terminology to match the others (as this tag harvester will list similar terms).

then we would be talking about the same things.

rambly tweetCloud

from: tweetcloud.com

i think two-word phrases are capitalized. (this is a screenshot)

i like the alphabetical order.  it creates sweet phrasing, such as, “gently getting ghostly” and “winter wish work”

tag, you’re it.

just wanted to mention, in case anyone else is pouting around this saturday, gleaning mysteries of the great quest for relevance, that even tho wordpress posts do top out in about fifteen (minutes), it is the wordpress.com/tag/… page that remains after a length of time.

for instance, look at this poor soul: http://www.google.com/search?q=poetdog

div on, yon divvers

(from rambly.tid#techblog)

so in searching (google) for .tid versions of these tiddlyspots, the div tags (<div></div>) mug up the info, and there i am, with my hard-earned searching strategies going to the good Mr. Ruston and the (taciturn?) UnaMesa.

don’t get me wrong, i would be more than happy to put tiddlywiki info on the front page. and in the code. wherever. but if i have a search listing, my peoples want to see what the site is about. right?

plus it says, only works with javascript, and i even know some javascript now, and i wouldn’t click on a link that says that, about ‘only works on’. cos of crash-ola potential, who wants to risk that?

but. upon further a-muse-ment, i wonder about those little div tags. cos every problem is its own solution, am i wrong? if i were wrong, well, that would be a problem, and if it were true that i were wrong about every problem being its own solution, well, then, there would not be an inherent solution to that problem, so let us be thankful that this is not the case, and i am, indeed, not wrong.

about the div tags. if google likes div tags, then i say, give ‘em div tags! what if, when we get our shiny new tiddlywiki file, we can type in our site description, and it goes in da div tags! can that be done? is it impossible?

what if, oh, let’s go crazy here, and say that what if the tiddlers i wanted to release to the feed were to go in a similar <tag> situation in the html file.

but see, i would be as happy as this octopus to lets my tags, and only my tags, be submitted. not every stupid thing i ever say needs to be referenced forever, you know.

just the tags. when i name the tags, i name what the info is about. and my tags go in the html file, and get searched by the googly ones, and read by the (soon forthcoming from who knows where) tagReader (s).

question of tag(s) plurality is still on the table.

feed at your own risk

i think it’s going to be one of those days. lots to say. lots to go.

so firstly, tags are getting more boxy. suspect the box.

this is about this here wordpress, and vimeo. both have tagboxes with an extra click to add tags. why? who wants an extra click? who wants to mess up their mojo thinking about the moral and commercial implications of adding? what is addng, exactly? what am i adding to ?

are tags addWords, now?

how we did manage to do that? and speaking of managing, how many durn things am i going to manage over there on the right. what do you think i am made of time? i was jsut starting to figure out the difference between ‘options’ and ‘manage’ and now i have ‘manage’ and ‘design’. is one a verb and one a noun? or has ‘manage’ become a noun. sort of ‘management options’?

a post and a page and a link?

what is this thing being designed for?

what happens if i keep a post private? is that not the same as a draft? or are those posts only published to oneself? that durn thing is autosaving.

holy gamoley, that save box is autosaving. not at any choice of my own.

am i in wordpress world now. did i buy a ticket?

ok, there is publish status, unpublished (status), keep this post private (option), publish immediately (edit). preview this post (?) (am i not writing it? i know what it says.)

oh, i guess alot of this is in response to the general consternation of whether things are being immediately archived to the (various?) feeds. or was that just me?

i think there might be a bit of fear of being left out of the loop. of losing one’s position in the hierarchy?

i feel fair and confident when i say:

do not fear. all is equally relevant.